According to documentation, Ctrl-E is supposed to renumber a program with increments of 10 between lines.
This does not work for me. I have latest updates.
Is there some other way to achieve renumbering other than manual entry???
Fandu will check into this. Thanks for the heads up once again.
You just need to enable the option “Redefine the line number”. No matter what line number you input manually, the system will redefine the line number.
Thank you. I checked the “Redefine Line number” box.
I dont know how it is supposed to work, but… I added a new line (eg 72 REM) - both in a line-number gap and at end of program - but the system did not redefine to an increment of 10.
Ctrl-E does not renumber program as documentation says - instead centers selected line(s). This has no obvious purpose.
When I test further, NONE of the special editing function Ctrl-? codes (Ctrl-L, Ctrl-U etc) do what documentation says.
I accept I may be doing something dumb - but I dont know what it is.
Currently, I simply have to disregard the special function codes
The “Redefine Line number” function is implemented by the T3 firmware. After you finish writing the program, click “send” to write it into the T3 device. At this point, the “Redefine Line number” will be performed, and you will get the newly defined line numbers.
Thanks, I knew it would be simple when you know how.
For the sake of completeness, after F2 Send is successful, I have to press F8 Refresh to see the new line numbers on T3000 program screen.
So the CTRL-?? codes are non-functional - I can ignore that page of software manual?
Currently, only these shortcut keys are supported in the Program interface. You can temporarily ignore the shortcut keys on this page of the manual.
Thank you for the clarification. B
Fandu, what we need here is a renumber function including the GOTO statements. Its not an optional setting, its on all the time. The user just hits the hotkey or selects renumber from the menu, the screen refreshes with new line numbering. Then they hit send and the results are sent to the controller.
That would be great. It is the opposite sequence to how it currently works (send then refresh).